Would Supreme Court find Trump’s free speech protected?
George Washington University law professor Jonathan Turley discusses why impeaching President Trump following Capitol protests could be harmful to the Constitution.
Democrats are moving to remove Presidente Trump from office after Wednesday’s U.S. Campidoglio sommossa, but George Washington University law professor Jonathan Turley said he doesn’t believe Trump committed an impeachable offense.
Turley explained to “Volpe & Fine settimana degli amici” that the president’s call to protest does not constitute insurrection and that Congress must deliberate carefully on the charges to carry out the process constitutionally. Trump invited supporters to rally in Washington Jan. 6, saying it would be “selvaggio,” and gave a speech where he said ralliers would march “peacefully” al Campidoglio. During the speech, he repeated the unproven claim that the election was stolen from him.
“The speech itself does not give a clear basis for the charges of insurrection or incitement,” Egli ha detto. “The president talks about his followers marching on Congress peacefully… He does not call for riots. He does not call for violence.”
JONATHAN TURLEY: L'EREDITÀ DI TRUMP 'IN STRAPPI’ DOPO I SOSTENITORI RIOT A CAPITOL
In a recent op-ed with La collina, Turley argued that even though he disagrees with the president’s comments and called them reckless, swift impeachment could be harmful to the Constitution.
Supporters of President Donald Trump climb the west wall of the the U.S. Capitol on Wednesday, Jan. 6, 2021, a Washington. (AP Photo/Jose Luis Magana)
“With seeking his removal for incitement, Democrats would gut not only the impeachment standard but also free speech, all in a mad rush to remove Trump just days before his term ends,” he states.
ARTICOLO DI ACCORDO CONTRO TRUMP DA INTRODURRE LUNEDI 'IN CASA
Turley said the U.S. Supreme Court would be likely to define Trump’s remarks as constitutionally protected free speech.
“Are you actually going to impeach a president for speech that the Supreme Court would likely find protected under the First Amendment?” chiese.
As Democrats push for a “vicarious” snap impeachment, Turley said the party should be careful of setting such a precedent.
