UConn had cited “just cause” in terminating Ollie by accusing him of failing to keep the coaching staff in compliance with the NCAA’s recruiting standards. Per the terms of the firing, the university was hoping to clean its hands from having to pay Ollie for the remaining figures of his contract. The accusations were seen as secondary violations, but UConn stuck to the claim and fired Ollie — also inciting a three-year coaching ban by the NCAA.
While the arbitrator did side with UConn’s “just cause” label, the official statement announced that the university had not properly vetted Ollie’s case ahead of a 16-month investigation by the NCAA and prematurely fired the coach before assessing the findings.
Ollie first started as the assistant coach under 26-year head coach Jim Calhoun and became his successor in 2012. Ollie led a seventh-seeded UConn Huskies team in 2014 to the school’s fourth national championship against John Calipari’s Kentucky Wildcats.
The legal battle between Ollie and UConn has stretched out for four years, siguiendo un 2017-18 campaign that ended in the team’s consecutive losing season. The Huskies went 14-18 in his final year, prompting skepticism by the media as to whether UConn’s decision was entirely based on violating NCAA rules or a tipping point for the prestigious basketball program.
Per the arbitration order, UConn will be forced to pay out Ollie for the remaining $ 11,157,032.95 left in his contract in the next 10 dias.
Ollie released a declaración through his legal counsel on the yearslong legal battle’s ultimate decision.
“I am pleased with arbitrator Mark Irvings ruling which found that UConn did not have just cause to terminate my contract,” Ollie said. “I wish to thank God and my family, whose grace sustained me over the last four years.”
His legal defense reinforced the ruling’s message.
“[I]t restores his good reputation as an individual with the highest ethical standards,” Ollie’s attorneys noted. “Contrary to the NCAA’s erroneous and unfounded decision released on July 2, 2019, Kevin Ollie did not violate the NCAA rules that were used to justify the draconian sanctions against him.”
UConn released a response to the arbitrator’s decision, claiming that it sets a bad standard for programs that wish to re-tool their coaching staffs as they please. The school’s statement announced that UConn “vigorously disagrees” with the outcome.
“UConn vigorously disagrees with the decision of the arbitrator and maintains without reservation that the decision to terminate Kevin Ollie when it did was the correct and appropriate decision. ...
“As an NCAA member institution, UConn did not have the luxury of waiting more than a year before terminating Ollie for the misconduct the university was aware he had engaged in. UConn could not continue to employ a head coach with the knowledge that he had violated NCAA rules that put student athletes, as well as the entire UConn athletics program, in jeopardy.”