Virginia Democrat says protests outside of justices' homes 'will almost certainly have the opposite effect'

The local Virginia Democrat argued thatthe most appropriate venue for this to happen” 이다 “at the public institution where policies are introduced, debated and ultimately agreed to or rejected. This is where we listen and where we act.

PRO-ABORTION PROTESTERS MARCH TO HOMES OF JUSTICES KAVANAUGH AND ROBERTS IN ‘VIGILFOR ROE V. 걸어 건너기

Protesters outside Justice Samuel Alito's home

Protesters outside Justice Samuel Alito’s home (폭스 뉴스)

He also noted that public officials know they’re public figures who are often in the spotlight andrecognize the responsibilities that come with that.

McKay said that while public officials often make themselves available to their constituents, their private homes are where they spend time with family and recharge.

I understand the idea that protesters want to bring literally to our doorsteps their anger and frustrations, but I can also tell you from personal and professional experience that will almost certainly have the opposite effect of what they may be seeking,” 그가 썼어.

He also looked at the legality of whether the protests outside homes andwhether it is an appropriate or effective tactic.

Pro-choice protesters led marches outside the 주택 of Justices Samuel Alito, Brett Kavanaugh and Chief Justice Roberts following the leak of a 대법원 draft opinion, which signaled the court was getting ready to overturn Roe v. 걸어 건너기.

Pro-abortion protesters outside home of Justice Amy Coney Barrett

Pro-abortion protesters outside home of Justice Amy Coney Barrett (폭스 뉴스 디지털)

He said that it was determined that the Virginia governor’s request to establish asecurity perimeteraround the houses of the justices was a violation of the fourth amendment after consulting with an attorney and the police department.

PRO-CHOICE GROUP TO TARGET ALL 6 GOP-APPOINTED SCOTUS JUSTICESHOMES FOR ‘WALK-BY-WEDNESDAY’ PROTESTS

추가로, though a federal statute indicates protests are not legal if the intent is to influence a judiciary decision, a federal law is only enforceable by federal authorities, and they would presumably do so it if they saw fit, 아직, to our knowledge, have not,” 그가 썼어.

He also said that enforcement of Virginia’s law prohibiting picketing at a private residencewould not hold up in court and is likely unconstitutional.

Protesters at the home of Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito

Protesters at the home of Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito (폭스 뉴스)

폴리티코 퍼스트 신고 the draft opinion, written by Justice Alito, who signaled the court was getting ready to overturn Roe v. Wade in the Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization case.

We hold that Roe케이시 must be overruled,” Alito wrote in the draft. “It is time to heed the Constitution and return the issue of abortion to the people’s elected representatives.

댓글이 닫혀 있습니다..