Vulnerable Democrats Horsford, Gottheimer explain votes against bipartisan Supreme Court security bill

In statements provided to Fox News Digital, Rep. Steven Horsford, D-Nev., en Rep. Josh Gottheimer, D-N.J., voorgestel, onderskeidelik, that their support for the bipartisan Supreme Court Police Parity Act van 2022 was contingent upon support for stricter gun control measures and protections for all federal judges, not just the Supreme Court.

As innocent lives are lost in Buffalo, Uvalde, Tulsa, and everyday massacres, Republicans in the Senate acted swiftly on increasing security for the Supreme Court,” Horsford said, referring to a number of mass shootings, including the tragic deaths of 19 students and two teachers at a Texas elementary school verlede maand.

They should act as swiftly to protect the innocent lives of our children and so many other victims of the gun violence that is occurring every day throughout our country by passing common sense gun safety reforms that a vast majority of Americans support and demand,” hy het bygevoeg.

THESE 27 DEMOCRATS VOTED AGAINST PROTECTIONS FOR SUPREME COURT JUSTICES

Amerikaanse. Rep. Steven Horsford, D-Nev., speaks on infrastructure and climate change during a news conference outside the Capitol on August 23, 2021 in Washington, DC.

Amerikaanse. Rep. Steven Horsford, D-Nev., speaks on infrastructure and climate change during a news conference outside the Capitol on August 23, 2021 in Washington, DC. (Foto deur Kevin Dietsch/Getty Images)

Gottheimer suggested he voted against the bill because it did not include protections for all federal judges, and pointed to the shooting death of a New Jersey judge’s son at their home by a man who had appeared before her in court.

Why don’t some of my colleagues care about the safety of all federal judges?” hy het geskryf. “In 2020, a violent extremist easily found the home address of Judge Esther Salas in New Jersey, he showed up dressed as a FedEx delivery man, and heartbreakingly shot and killed her only child, 20-year-old Daniel.

DEMOCRATS PUSH OFF SUPREME COURT PROTECTION BILL AFTER ARMED MAN CHARGED WITH ATTEMPTED MURDER OF KAVANAUGH

Federal judges are being targeted, a son of one has been killed, and some of my colleagues are refusing to offer any protections,” hy het bygevoeg.

Gottheimer later expanded on his vote against the bill in a lengthy Twitter thread, explaining that he actually supported expanding protections for Supreme Court justices, maar dat hy “could not supporta bill thatcontinues to ignore the pleas of all federal judges for greater security.

Amerikaanse. Rep. Josh Gottheimer, D-N.J., speaks on Iran negotiations at a news conference on Capitol Hill, April 06, 2022 in Washington, DC.

Amerikaanse. Rep. Josh Gottheimer, D-N.J., speaks on Iran negotiations at a news conference on Capitol Hill, April 06, 2022 in Washington, DC. (Kevin Dietsch/Getty Images)

The bill passed in the Senate last month by a unanimous consent vote, en passed in the House Tuesday deur 'n stem van 396-27. Almal 27 “Geen” votes were Democrats.

Egter, Gottheimer and Horsford did vote for a bill increasing their own security in 2021 following the Jan. 6 storming of the U.S. Kapitool.

Kommentaar gesluit.