WHO chief censored on China's internet after calling zero-Covid unsustainable

A version of this story appeared in CNN’s Meanwhile in China newsletter, a three-times-a-week update exploring what you need to know about the country’s rise and how it impacts the world. Teken hier in.

The head of the World Health Organization (WIE) is being censored on China’s internet after questioning the sustainability of the country’s zero-Covid policy.

The censorship on Weibo and WeChat, China’s two largest social media platforms, targets WHO Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesuscomments that expressed rare disagreement with Beijing’s policies.
When we talk about the zero-Covid strategy, we don’t think that it is sustainable, considering the behavior of the virus now and what we anticipate in the future,” Tedros told a media briefing Tuesday, citing the increased transmissibility of Omicron.
    We have discussed this issue with Chinese experts and we indicated that the approach will not be sustainableI think a shift will be very important,” hy het gesê.
      The criticism from Tedros, who was accused of being too close to China earlier in the pandemic, came just days after Chinese leader Xi Jinping vowed to double down on the policy andresolutely struggleagainst all critics.
        The United Nation’s official press account on China’s Twitter-like Weibo posted Tedro’s comments early on Wednesday morning, drawing a wave of sarcastic comments from Chinese users.
        Resolutely fight against any words and acts that distort, doubt or deny our country’s epidemic prevention and control policies! Down with the World Health Organization!” a top reply said.
          Should the UN’s verified account be blocked this time?” het 'n ander gesê.
          By mid-morning, the post was no longer viewable on Weibodue to the author’s privacy setting.It is unclear under what circumstances the setting was changed.
          A Weibo hashtag of Tedrosname has also been censored, with images featuring his face being scrubbed from the platform, though posts containing his name are still visible.
          On WeChat, an article from the UN’s official account that included Tedroscomments has beenbanned from sharing due to a violation of relevant laws and regulationsas of Wednesday morning. Video clips of Tedrosspeech have also been removed from the platform.
          China’s zero-tolerance approach of snap lockdowns, mass testing and quarantining has protected the majority of its population from Covid over the past two years, but it has drawn rising dissent as the lockdowns become more stringent and frequent amid the fast spread of Omicron.
          Shanghai, the country’s most populous and cosmopolitan city, is reeling from a six-week lockdown dit het sparked public outcry, while the capital Beijing has shut schools, restaurants and rolled out frequent mass testing to curb its outbreak. Elders, more local governments are imposing swift lockdowns in response to just a handful of cases.
          But the Chinese leadership has insisted on the strict measures, saying a relaxation willinevitably lead to large scale infections, a large number of serious illness and deathsdue to the country’s large number of elderly people and insufficient medical resources.
          New modeling by researchers mostly from Shanghai’s Fudan University predicted China could face over 1.5 million Omicron deaths if its zero-Covid measures are lifted without increased vaccine coverage or access to antiviral therapies.
          Released Tuesday by the journal Nature Medicine, the peer-reviewed study found that based on immunity levels as of March, an unchecked Omicron wave would exceed critical care capacity across the country, veroorsaak 112.2 million symptomatic cases.
          The research estimates that in the event of an uncontrolled Omicron outbreak, China’s national healthcare system would be completely overwhelmed, with demand for the country’s 64,000 ICU beds outstripping supply 15.6-times over, for a period of at least 44 dae.
          But that scenario could be avoided, according to the modeling, if the Chinese government focuses on increasingaccessibility to vaccines and antiviral therapies.
            Meer as 88% of Chinese people have been fully vaccinated, but immunization is much lower among the elderly. As of March 17, only half of people aged over 80 in China have been fully vaccinated, and less than 20% of that vulnerable age group have received a booster. Unlike most countries, elderly people were not originally prioritized in China’s vaccination campaigns.
            Since the latest outbreak, Chinese officials have vowed to speed up vaccination among the elderly. But in locked-down areas, it is virtually impossible to get vaccinated as residents are confined to their homes and allowed to go out only for Covid testing.

            Kommentaar gesluit.