Oculudentavis means “eye tooth bird” in Latin, but Daza said taxonomic rules for naming and organizing animal species meant that they had to continue using it even though it wasn’t accurate.
“Since Oculudentavis is the name originally used to describe this taxon, it has priority and we have to maintain it,” Daxa said. “The taxonomy can be sometimes deceiving.”
The better-preserved 호박색, which was found in the same amber-mining region in Myanmar as the first described Oculudentavis specimen, held part of the lizard’s skeleton, including its skull, with visible scales and soft tissue. Both pieces of amber were 99 백만년.
The authors said the creature was difficult to categorize, but by using CT scans to separate, analyze and compare each bone from the two species, they detected characteristics that identified the animals as lizards.
These included the presence of scales; teeth attached directly to the jawbone rather than nestled into sockets, as dinosaur teeth were; lizardlike eye structures and shoulder bones; and a hockey-stick-shaped skull that is universally shared by other scaled reptiles.
In the better-preserved specimen, the team spotted a raised crest running down the top of the snout and a flap of loose skin under the chin that may have been inflated in display, characteristics shared by other lizards.
The authors believe that both species’ skulls had become deformed as the amber, made from globs of resin from ancient tree bark, hardened around them. They said that Oculudentavis khaungraae’s snout was squeezed into a narrower, more beaklike shape while Oculudentavis naga’s braincase was compressed.
The distortions magnified birdlike features in one skull and lizardlike features in the other, said coauthor Edward Stanley, director of the Florida Museum of Natural History’s Digital Discovery and Dissemination Laboratory.
“Imagine taking a lizard and pinching its nose into a triangular shape,” Stanley said in a 성명서. “It would look a lot more like a bird.” Birds are the only living relatives of dinosaurs.
An ethical minefield
Some of paleontology’s most exciting finds in recent years have emerged from northern Myanmar’s rich amber deposits
. Much of the amber finds its way to markets in southwest China
, where it is bought by collectors and scientists
. 하나, ethical concerns about who benefits from the sale of amber have emerged
, particularly since
2017, when Myanmar’s military took control of amber mines
. Government forces and ethnic minorities have fought in this region for years
, 그리고 United Nations report has accused the military of torture
, rape and sexual violence
The study authors said in the news release that the amber was purchased by gemologist Adolf Peretti before 2017 from an authorized company that has no ties to Myanmar’s military, and money from the sale did not support armed conflict.
They said use of the specimen followed guidelines set out by the Society of Vertebrate Paleontology, which has asked colleagues to refrain from working on amber sourced from Myanmar since June 2017.
“As scientists we feel it is our job to unveil these priceless traces of life, so the whole world can know more about the past. But we have to be extremely careful that during the process, we don’t benefit a group of people committing crimes against humanity,” Daza said.
“결국, the credit should go to the miners who risk their lives to recover these amazing amber fossils.”