WSJ Editorial Board: The virus lab theory's new credibility

1月に 2020, international media began reporting about a virus spreading in the Chinese city of Wuhan. “The coronavirus could result in a global pandemic,” said Sen. Tom Cotton on Jan. 30, 2020. “I would note that 武漢 has China’s only biosafety level-four super laboratory that works with the world’s most deadly pathogens to include, はい, coronavirus.

CLICK HERE TO GET THE OPINION NEWSLETTER

The world would learn more about COVID-19and the WIV. But it was always reasonable to ask if the virus came from a nearby lab that handled dangerous viruses. On Feb. 6, 2020, Botao Xiao of the South China University of Technology posted a paper concluding the virusprobably originated from a laboratory in Wuhan.But the Chinese government strictly controls research into COVID-19’s origins, and the molecular biomechanics researcher withdrew his publication.

The Communist Party then went on offense, with Beijing’s ambassador to the U.S. declaring that lab-leak theories wereabsolutely crazyand couldfan up racial discrimination, xenophobia.After Mr. Cotton responded by calling on 中国 に “open up now to competent international scientists,” the media chose denial: “Tom Cotton keeps repeating a coronavirus conspiracy theory that was already debunked” (ワシントンポスト) そして “Senator Tom Cotton Repeats Fringe Theory of Coronavirus Origins” (ニューヨーク・タイムズ).

CLICK HERE TO CONTINUE READING THIS EDITORIAL IN THE WALL STREET JOURNAL

カテゴリー:

i898

タグ:

, , , ,

コメントは締め切りました.